From helicopter to "psychopter": the role of anti-torque?
Global Insight from Crown Chakra Dynamics in 3D? (Part #8)
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Gallery] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]
With respect to "ascent", an obvious metaphor has been extensively explored from a philosophical perspective by Arthur Young, following his role as designer of the first Bell Helicopter. He framed this as the possibility of developing a "psychopter" (Geometry of Meaning, 1976; The Bell Notes: A Journey from Physics to Metaphysics. 1979).
The case for exploring any such metaphors follows from that made for biomimetics, as discussed separately (Engendering a Psychopter through Biomimicry and Technomimicry: insights from the process of helicopter development, 2011).
There is the ironic possibility that the crown chakra could be recognized -- speculatively at least -- as embodying the functions of a "psychopter", as the future might choose to imagine it. Relevant to that argument would be the role of the dynamics of interlocking tori, as suggested above.
As traditionally imagined, the crown chakra would appear to reinforce a form of illusion. This corresponds usefully to the assumption that a helicopter needs only the more powerful operation of a single rotor in order to rise vertically. Given the nature of the focus on "cognitive ascent", could it be said to be ignoring a factor usefully illustrated by the helicopter?
Cognitive anti-torque? Most helicopters are characterized by having a single main rotor. Its operation engenders torque as a consequence of aerodynamic drag. For the helicopter to operate successfully, this must be countered by an opposing torque -- typically achieved by a tail rotor, pushing or pulling against the tail boom to counter the torque effect. Other designs include the use of counter-rotating ducted fans (dependent on the Coanda effect), or the use of two or more horizontal rotors turning in opposite directions.
One difficulty with respect to potential "cognitive development" in achieving "ascent", as speculatively imagined to be the primary achievement of a "psychopter", is the manner in which the operation of the primary rotor is framed as "positive". Any alternative is then readily framed as "negative". Positive is good -- negative is necessarily bad. Little if any consideration is given to the possibility that "positive" may exert a form of "aerodynamic drag" in psychosocial terms -- engendering a phenomenon that might be recognized as "cognitive torque".
This subtle effect might be recognized in anecdotal references to "too good to be true", in song, and in aspects of the opposition paradoxically engendered by those promoting "positive" agendas (John Maynard Smith, Too good to be true, Nature, 400, 1999, 223; Toni Vogel Carey, The Better-Best Fallacy, Philosophy Now, 2008; John Randolph Price, Nothing Is Too Good to Be True, 2003). Traditions have recognized the need to render creativity slightly imperfect to avoid evoking the "jealousy of the gods" (Mara Michelle Kutter, Emotion in Politics: envy, jealousy, and rulership in Archaic and Classical Greece, University of Michigan, 2018).
As an "unpopular" perspective, this effect is argued otherwise by Barbara Ehrenreich (Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America, 2009; Smile Or Die: How Positive Thinking Fooled America and the World, 2009). To the extent that the Crown Chakra is indicative of an embodiment of "enlightenment" as so widely associated with human perfection, it is appropriate to explore the little mentioned role of "endarkenment" in relation to that process in practice (Enlightening Endarkenment: selected web resources on the challenge to comprehension, 2005).
The manner in which the two tori are dynamically interlocked in the models above suggests an approach to thinking about "cognitive torque" and the manner by which it might be compensated or counter-acted (Comprehension of Requisite Variety for Sustainable Psychosocial Dynamics: transforming a matrix classification onto intertwined tori, 2006).
Cognitive torque? Whilst "cognitive anti-torque" is particularly elusive, the notion of "cognitive torque" or "psychological torque" has been variously recognized (Cognitive torque and fruitful associations, 2009). The following paragraphs derive from a discussion with regard to Reality distortion, psychosocial torsion and psychological torque (2019).
There is a degree of experience of being "twisted" by circumstances, of "being bent" in a manner which may well be unwelcome -- or of subjecting another to such a force. "Bending the arm" of another is a common phrase with respect to being manipulated -- as with having it "bent". The experience is beyond the focus of the natural sciences and is inadequately described, although it is clearly an effect sought by public relations, propaganda campaigns and brainwashing. As a typically problematic experience it does however offer a means of recognizing the nature and possibility of fruitful toroidal experience.
Of the greatest potential relevance to this argument are the shared associations of "torc" and "torque" -- with the latter best understood in dynamics with respect to a form of twisting. In such terms torque is what causes an object to acquire angular acceleration. As a static object, a torc could be understood as implying some such force -- if only in symbolic terms. The exploration of "toroidal life" is then suggestive of "life with a dynamic twist" -- potentially vital to enabling and sustaining change. A torc can then be considered a traditional reminder of that possibility -- and hence its symbolic importance in some contexts where change is otherwise elusive. As experienced personally, references to "psychological torque" and "psychic torque" are discussed below -- but not in the light of their potential relevance to the twisting experience of structural violence and its variants (cultural violence, emotional violence, spiritual violence).
Reality distortion: Curiously the clearest description of the problematic nature of the phenomenon may be with respect to the so-called "reality distortion field" exerted by charismatic personalities to convince themselves and others to believe almost anything with a mix of charm, charisma, bravado, hyperbole, marketing, appeasement and persistence:
- Markus Giesle: Is There a Science Behind Reality Distortion Fields? (The Huffington Post, 16 September 2015)
- Matt K. Lewis: The Trump Reality Distortion Filter: why so many US Republicans are suspending their disbelief (The Telegraph, 28 November 2015)
- Fred Barnes: Trump's Reality Distortion Field (Washington Examiner, 21 May 2017).
- Richard Waters: The Long and the Short of Elon Musk's Reality Distortion Field (Financial Times, 9 August 2018)
- Michael Shermer: The Reality Distortion Field: Steve Jobs's modus operandi of ignoring reality is a double-edged sword (eSceptic, 10 July 2013)
- Tim Ferriss: How It Works: Clinton's "Reality Distortion Field" (21 November 2010)
The capacity to engender such a field may now be the essence of leadership -- and the primary requisite for those seeking that role. Comprehending the nature of such reality distortion is necessarily rendered more complex by the phenomenon of fake news (Varieties of Fake News and Misrepresentation: when are deception, pretence and cover-up acceptable? 2019).
Torsion and twistedness: To the extent that such psychosocial experience is described, the language for its description borrows from the dynamics of torque and torsion as well-recognized in mechanical terms. In that context, torsion is the twisting of an object due to an applied torque. The latter, as the moment, moment of force, or "turning effect", is the rotational equivalent of linear force. The power output of an engine is expressed as its torque multiplied by its rotational speed of the axis. In considering the generation of any form of psychosocial power in the implementation of a strategy -- and getting it to "fly" -- there is a case for recognizing the role of torque. Using a typical helicopter as a metaphor, its single main rotor creates torque such that its aerodynamic drag must be countered by an opposing anti-torque rotor -- the smaller rotor in the tail. The question is how such compensation is achieved in psychosocial systems -- and whether many strategies spin uselessly for lack of an "anti-torque" rotor.
The following description of a combination of socio-economic forces as "torsions" by Matthew C. Ally clarifies the matter somewhat, although lacking any reference to corresponding psychosocial forces:
We might call these torsions: economic torsion, social torsion, and ecological torsion respectively, twisting together from the ground up, bending the arm of the status quo. And of course the three heuristic torsions overlap, the economic, the social, the ecological, nudging and tugging at each other in complementary and critical ways through the push and pull of theory and practice... (Ecology and Existence: Bringing Sartre to the Water's Edge, Lexington Books, 2017 p. 485)
| Quotations indicative of understandings of "psychological torque", "psychic torque" and "psychological torsion" (emphasis added) |
Psychological torque:
Psychic torque:
Psychological torsion:
Psychic torsion:
|
It is then appropriate to ask at this time: Does "global" reality -- and the requirement to believe in it -- involve a very particular and peculiar form of cognitive "torsion" or "twist", in contrast with the daily direct experience of "flat earth" reality?
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Gallery] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]