Participant Interaction Messaging

Year: 
1980

Improving the conference process (Part #1)


Originally version printed in Transnational Associations, 1980, 1, pp 27-35 [PDF version]. This version contains additional case studies of computer-enhanced messaging in conferences in the 1990s. For current information on the compterized applications, check the site maintained by Robert Pollard -- including examples under the name Dazibao. 


#S123: 'A summary without a problem is a bore' (Anon, SGSR, 1979). 
#F026: 'What are the questions that we do not dare to ask at this gathering ?' (Anon, Findhorn, 1979) 

The problem

Despite the sophistication of conference organization, there is an increasing sense of malaise (1). Even in well-organized events, something seems to be missing.

There are a variety of symptoms of this, including:

  • participants preferring coffee table exchanges to formal sessions,
  • participants simply bored with preplanned sessions and finding excuses to leave the conference site (whether for business engagements or tourism),
  • participants intimidated by the proficiency of those who frequently participate in such events,
  • small group sessions failing to bring together the people who could fruitfully interact,
  • participants frustrated in their efforts to present ideas to others, possibly because of discussion time constraints,
  • participants irritated by the formality or informality of the conference process (e.g. style of chairperson, protocol arrangements, etc.),
  • experienced participants 'holding back' from active involvement in discussion sessions in order to give inexperienced newcomers an opportunity,
  • speakers frustrated in their inability to continue a dialogue with participants after their presentation (and possibly on other topics),
  • participant irritation at use of discussion time by some to publicise their interests and views in order to make useful contacts,
  • participants and speakers unable to correct misunderstandings which appear to have arisen from their interventions,
  • pre-planned topics preventing discussion of spontaneously emergent topics or those of interest to a participant minority,
  • participants with several interests unable to communicate ideas to sessions organized in parallel with the one corresponding to their major interest or obligation,
  • ideas distorted by poor simultaneous interpretation,
  • participants having difficulty in determining the people with whom discussions would be most fruitful.

Much of the interest of a conference lies in the unforeseen communication between those present. This is necessarily unplannable and independent of the conference programme. The challenge is to find ways of stimulating and facilitating it.  

#U214: 'We are a beautiful metaphor of the problem we claim to be facing' (Anon, UNEP/INFO TERRA, 1979). 


[Parts: Next | Last | All ] [Links: From-K | From-Kx ]