You are here

Would Jesus Now be Prosecuted by US?


Citations of non-Kairos documents (References)

[Parts: First | All ] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx ]



Amram, David Werner.  The Prosecution of Jesus, Its Date, History and Legality by Richard Wellington Husband. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 66, 1918, 7/8, pp. 380-382. [review]

Betz, Otto.  Probleme des Prozesses Jesu. In: Hildegard Temporini und Wolfgang Haase (Eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, de Gruyter, 1982, pp. 565-647.

Betz, Otto.  Der Prozess Jesu im Licht jüdischer Quellen. Brunnen, 2007.

Blackburn, C. H.  The Trial of Jesus from a Lawyer's View. Robert Clarke, 1890.

Blinzler, Josef.  Der Prozess Jesu: das jüdische und das römische Gerichtsverfahren gegen Jesus Christus auf Grund der ältesten Zeugnisse. Pustet, 1955.

Bock, Darrell L.  Blasphemy and the Jewish Examination of Jesus. Bulletin for Biblical Research, 17, 2007, 1, pp. 53-114. [text]

Bock, Darrell L.  Blasphemy and Exaltation in Judaism and the Final Examination of Jesus: a philological-historical study of the key Jewish themes impacting Mark 14:61-64. Mohr siebeck, 1998.

Bluebaugh, Jacob.  The Ecclesiastical Trial of Jesus Christ. Calvary Bible College, 2008. [text]

Buss, Septimus.  The Trial of Jesus: illustrated from Talmud and Roman Law. Nabu Press, 1906.

Cerulo, Karen A.  Never Saw It Coming: cultural challenges to envisioning the worst. University of Chicago Press, 2006.

Chauvin, Constantin.  Le Procès de Jésus-Christ. 1901. [text]

Cheever, Henry M.  The Legal Aspects of the Trial of Christ. Bibliotheca sacra, 60 , 1903, pp. 495-509. [text]

Chomsky, Noam / Herman, Edward S.  Manufacturing Consent: the political economy of the mass media. Panthon Books, 1988.

Cohn, Chaim.  The Trial and Death of Jesus. Konecky and Konecky, 2000.

Cohn, Chaim.  Der Prozess und Tod Jesu aus jüdischer sicht. Jüdischer Verlag im Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.. [text]

Cresswell, Peter.  Jesus the Terrorist. John Hunt Publishing, 2010.

Danziger, Adolphe.  The Condemnation of Christ. Open Court, 17, 1903, pp. 212-227. [text]

De Nicolas, Antonio T.  Four-dimensional Man: meditations through the Rg Veda. Nicholas Hays, 1978. [summary]

Dekle, George R.  The Case against Christ: a critique of the prosecution of Jesus. Cambridge scholars Publishing, 2011. [contents]

Demandt, Alexander.  Pontius Pilatus. C. H. Beck, 2012. [review]

Duthoit, André.  Le Procès de Jésus. Revue Polaire, 5 février 2008. [text]

Gaynor, W. J.  The Arrest and Trial of Jesus Viewed form a Legal Standpoint. American Lawyer, 5, 1897, 531. [text]

Gaynor, W. J.  Arrest and Trial of Jesus Viewed form a Legal Standpoint. American Lawyer, 11, 1903, 241. [text]

Hatch, Edward W.  The Trial and Condemnation of Christ as a Legal Question. The Green Bag, 1893, pp. 398- 403, 449-456.. [text]

Hoeh, Herman L.  Twelve Reasons Why Jesus' Trial Was Illegal. 1983. [text]

Hoeh, Herman L.  Douze raisons pour lesquelles le procès de Jésus fut illégal. 1983. [text]

Hofstadter, Douglas.  Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books, 1979.

Hofstadter, Douglas.  I Am a Strange Loop. Basic Books, 2007.

Husband, Richard Wellington.  The Prosecution of Jesus: its date, history and legality. Princeton University Press, 1916. [text]

Husband, Richard Wellington.  The Prosecution of Jesus: its date, history and legality. Ulan Press, 2012.

Husband, Richard Wellington.  The Prosecution of Jesus: its date, history and legality. Nabu Press, 2010.

Husband, Richard Wellington.  The Prosecution of Jesus: its date, history and legality. HardPress Publishing, 2013.

Husband, Richard Wellington.  The Prosecution of Jesus: its date, history and legality. Cornell University Library, 2009.

Hyamson, M.  Husband's 'Prosecution of Jesus' The Prosecution of Jesus. Its Date, History and Legality. The Jewish Quarterly Review, 11, 1920, 1, pp. 89-97. [review]

Innes, Alexander Taylor.  The Trial of Jesus Christ. T. and T. Clark, 1899. [text]

Jesse, Dominik.  Der Präfekt Pontius Pilatus und seine Rolle im Prozess gegen Jesus. GRIN Verlag, 2007.

Kertelge, Karl  (Ed.).    Der Prozess gegen Jesus. Historische Rückfrage und theologische Deutung, Herder, 1989.

Lapide, Pinchas.  Wer war schuld an Jesu Tod?. Gütersloher Verlagshaus Mohn, 1987.

Lengle, Josef.  Zum Prozess Jesu. Hermes 70, 1935, 3, pp. 312-321. [text]

Lemann, M. M.  Jesus before the Sanhedrin. Oxford, 1899.

Linder, Doug.  The Trial of Jesus: An Account. UMKC school of Law, 2002. [text]

Lischak, Gabriel N.  12 Reasons Jesus' Trial Was Illegal. The Pillar (The Restored Church of God). [text]

Mansfield, Stephen.  Crucifying Terrorists. The Huffington Post, 14 May 2013. [text]

Meister, Gerd.  Mein Gott: Pontius Pilatus macht kurzen Prozess mit Jesus. strafblog.de, 8. April 2012. [text]

Mikat, Paul.  Art. Prozess Jesu II. Rechtsgeschichtlich. Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, 8, 1999, pp. 676-678.

Miller, Gabriel.  Der Prozess Jesu aus sicht des Jüdischen Rechts. Goethe Universität. [text]

Oreskes, Naomi / Conway, Erik M.  Merchants of Doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, 2010. [summary]

Otte, Gerhard.  Neues zum Prozess gegen Jesus?. Die "schuldfrage" vor dem Hintergrund der christlich-jüdischen Beziehungen. Institut für Glaube und Wissenschaft, 1992. [text]

Prothero, Stephen R.  God Is Not One: the eight rival religions that run the world -- and why their differences matter. HarperOne, 2011.

Radin, Max.  The Trial of Jesus of Nazareth. Lawbook Exchange, 1931.

Reinbold, Wolfgang.  Der Prozess Jesu. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2006.

Rosadi, Giovanni.  The Trial of Jesus. Dodd-Mead, 1905. [abstract]

Rosen, Klaus.  Der Prozess Jesu und die römische Provinzialverwaltung. F. S. H. Hürten, 1988.

Rosen, Steven M.  Topologies of the Flesh: a multidimensional exploration of the lifeworld. Ohio University Press, 2006. [excerpts]

Rosen, Steven M.  Dimensions of Apeiron: a topological phenomenology of space, time, and individuation. Value Inquiry Book series of Editions Rodopi, 2004. [excerpts]

Rosen, Steven M.  Science, Paradox and the Moebius Principle: the evolution of the transcultural approach to wholeness. State University of New York Press, 1994. [summary]

Rüfner, Thomas.  Der Prozess Jesu Nach jüdischem Recht hätte es keine Kreuzigung gegeben. Legal Tribune Online, 29 March 2013. [text]

Sands, Philippe.  Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules. Viking Adult, 2005.

Sands, Philippe.  Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values. PalgraveMacmillan, 2008.

Schoeman, Roy.  Jesus Before the Sanhedrin: the legality of Jesus' trial under Jewish Law. Inside the Vatican, March 2005. [text]

Söding, Thomas.  Der Prozess Jesu - die historischen Umstände. Bergische Universität Wuppertal. [text]

Stalker, James.  The Trial and Death of Jesus Christ. ValdeBooks, 1894. [text]

Taleb, Nassim Nicholas.  The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Allen Lane, 2007. [summary]

Tardieu, Michel.  Le procès de Jésus vu par les Manichéens. Apocrypha, 8, 1997, pp. 9-24. [text]

Wingo, Earle H.  Publications, 1954.

Winter, Paul.  On the Trial of Jesus. Walter de Gruyter, 1974.

Wise, Isaac M.  The Martyrdom of Jesus. Bloch, 1888.. [text]

Wright, Curtis.  A Thing of Naught: world judgment and the trial of Jesus Christ. Religious Studies Center, 1959. [text]

Yanoti, Thomas.  Is Jesus Christ a terrorist?. That's what the government says!. Examiner.com, 14 April 2013. [text]

[Parts: First | All ] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx ]