Paradoxical Geopolitical Implications of Dynamics of Self-Other Overlap (Part #2)
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Visuals] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]
The following queries were evoked by previous explorations, including: the interplay of questions enabling transcendence of fundamental dilemmas (A Subjective Objection: Objecting to Subjection, 2016); Explaining reality 8 Embodying realization (Defining the objective 8 Refining the subjective ?! 2011); and mnemonic systems for memetic coding of complexity (Conditions of Objective, Subjective and Embodied Cognition, 2007)
Question to Perplexity: Is there a term for the degree of cognitive identification with an "other", most obviously in some reported existential experiences of intercourse, but otherwise as degrees of empathy (in contrast to antipathy)
| Perplexity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Yes, "self-other overlap" or "inclusion of the other in the self" describes the degree of cognitive identification with another person, spanning empathy levels from mild perspective-taking to intense merging experiences. This concept captures blurred boundaries between self and other, contrasting with antipathy's separation. Core Concept: Self-other overlap refers to a perceptual shift where the self and another become cognitively merged, often triggered by empathy or closeness. Researchers like Aron et al. measure it via diagrams showing circles overlapping from none to complete fusion. In empathy research, higher overlap correlates with prosocial behavior, as one's needs align with the other's. academic.oup+5? Relation to Empathy: Cognitive empathy involves perspective-taking, a lower degree of identification, while affective empathy can lead to deeper overlap via shared representations. Degrees range from understanding emotions intellectually to feeling them as one's own, measured by scales like IRI's Perspective Taking subscale. This aligns with stages in empathy processes, from identification to separation. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih+4? Existential Contexts: Intense overlap appears in intercourse as existential merging, akin to phenomenological "projection" or "fusion" in intimate acts. In relationships, "emotional fusion" or "enmeshment" denotes extreme degrees, blurring autonomy. These echo self-expansion theory, where partners incorporate each other's identities. wikipedia+4? Contrast to Antipathy: Antipathy maintains or heightens self-other distinction, fostering separation rather than overlap. Empathy scales contrast high identification (e.g., sympathy) with low or negative (apathy/antipathy). Overlap thus scales positively against antipathic distancing. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+3? | Self-other overlap is a key term in both psychology and philosophy for describing cognitive merging between self and other. Psychology uses it to denote degrees of identification in empathy, while philosophy explores it through intersubjectivity and fusion concepts. These terms highlight blurred boundaries, contrasting with separation in antipathy. Psychological Terms: Self-other overlap captures the extent to which one's mental representations include another's, often measured by the Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) Scale. Related concepts include "self-other merging," central to empathy models like the Perception-Action Model (PAM), distinguishing neural overlap from subjective resonance. "Cognitive fusion" describes rigid identification with others' perspectives in relational contexts, while "enmeshment" signals excessive boundary blurring in attachments. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+3? Philosophical Terms: Intersubjectivity, from phenomenology (Husserl, Merleau-Ponty), refers to shared consciousness where self and other co-constitute experience. Fusion or "participation" in mystical or existential thought (e.g., Buber’s I-Thou relation) denotes profound unity, akin to intercourse experiences. Self-expansion (Aron) philosophically extends to relational ontology, viewing identity as porous through overlap. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+2? Key Distinctions:
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Question to Perplexity: How does this apply in the case of pets and plants
| Perplexity | ||||||||||||||||
| Self-other overlap applies to pets through owners' psychological integration of animals into their self-concept, fostering empathy and attachment akin to human bonds. This manifests as perceiving pets' needs as one's own, enhancing well-being but risking enmeshment. Research shows it boosts social support and inclusivity. Owner-Pet Dynamics: Owners often report high self-pet overlap, treating pets as family members with anthropomorphic traits like emotions and intentions. Studies using adapted IOS scales reveal greater overlap predicts stronger support from pets during stress, mirroring human empathy. Neurobiologically, oxytocin surges in human-pet interactions parallel parent-child bonds. cabidigitallibrary+2? Psychological Benefits: Pet ownership correlates with reduced loneliness via this overlap, as pets become extensions of self-identity. Human-animal similarity perceptions broaden empathy to other groups, lowering social dominance. High overlap aids those with social anxiety, compensating for human connections. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+1? Potential Risks: Excessive overlap can lead to grief like losing kin or dependency, especially post-trauma. Enmeshment appears in over-reliance, blurring pet autonomy. Balance prevents distress, as seen in moderated attachment studies. allenmcconnell+2?Self-other overlap with plants occurs less intensely than with pets but manifests in biophilia, attachment, and ecological self concepts. Owners of houseplants or gardeners report cognitive inclusion of plants into their identity, fostering care akin to mild empathy. This differs from pets due to plants' lack of sentience and reciprocity. | sychological Application: People experience "plant attachment" through positive attitudes like joy and aesthetics, linking to moral expansiveness and nature connectedness. Self-other blurring emerges in horticultural therapy, where nurturing plants expands self-boundaries, reducing stress. Unlike pets' bidirectional bonds, plant overlap is unidirectional but builds compassion via perceived vitality. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+1? Comparisons to Pets
| |||||||||||||||
Question to Perplexity: Presumably the response is extended in other ways to rivers and mountains or iconic special rocks
| Perplexity | ||||||||||||||||
| Self-other overlap extends to natural features like rivers, mountains, and special rocks through concepts of ecological identity and bioregional belonging. This involves cognitive incorporation of landscape elements into one's sense of self, fostering stewardship over exploitation. The intensity varies by personal, cultural, and experiential factors. Psychological Extensions: Biophilia hypothesis posits innate affinity leading to overlap with non-sentient entities, where rivers or mountains become "extensions of self." Place attachment research shows "rootedness," with iconic rocks symbolizing enduring identity fusion. Environmental psychology measures this via scales assessing emotional interdependence. nature+1?Philosophical Foundations: Deep ecology's "ecological self" (Arne Naess) explicitly includes rivers and mountains as part of broadened identity, blurring human-nature divides. Indigenous ontologies often embody this through totemic relations, where special rocks hold ancestral overlap. Phenomenology views landscapes as co-constitutive of lived experience. nph.onlinelibrary.wiley? | Continuum Across Entities
| |||||||||||||||
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Visuals] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]