You are here

Re-cognition of transformation in various domains


In Quest of a Dynamic Pattern of Transformations (Part #4)


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All | PDF] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]


Following Alexander, the question is then how to identity the range of domains in which processes of transformation are recognized in some way -- especially those which are familiar and of personal significance. Alexander's approach can, for example, be used as a template to explore the applicability of his pattern language in selected other domains, as with the experimental 5-fold Pattern Language (1984):

  • Template: This endeavours to describe the pattern in content-free terms as pure relationship. As such it is a guideline for the elaboration of patterns for other arenas.
  • Physical environment: This is an adaptation of Alexander's own pattern description
  • Socio-organizational environment: This describes the pattern as it applies to the organization of social groups, organizations and networks.
  • Conceptual environment: This describes the pattern as it applies to the organization of a conceptual framework or a body of knowledge.
  • Intra-personal environment: This describes the pattern as it applies to the organization of modes of awareness adopted by a person.

Again it needs to be stressed that that exploration focused on pattern in its static sense -- and not on the dynamics of a transformation, however much Alexander may have implied it through considering the manner in which design is engendered in practice (as in The Oregon Experiment, 1975). Any transformation process might well be recognized as a kind of standing wave, and the transformation might indeed be given a label for communication purposes. However such devices dissociate the person engaging in the process from the cognitive intimacy required by engagement in the dynamics of the transformation. A similar point can be made with respect to human values (Freedom, Democracy, Justice: isolated nouns or interwoven verbs? Illusory quest for qualities and principles dynamically disguised, 2011).

A set of domains could be identified in which "transformation" is variously recognized -- each domain being variously suggestive of insights into the elusive nature of the dynamics of the underlying generic pattern. The insights would seem to be associated with the manner in which the more readily recognized transformation processes are employed as metaphors. The elusive dynamic is effectively "sensed" in ways which permit its nature to be communicated to a degree through metaphor (cf. Metaphors as Transdisciplinary Vehicles of the Future, 1991).

The domains for consideration could then include the following, tentatively clustered for convenience:

  1. Abstract / formalization
    • mathematics (as discussed below)

  2. Fundamental, as in the preoccupations of fundamental physics, especially astrophysics (cf. Towards an Astrophysics of the Knowledge Universe from astronautics to noonautics? 2006):
  3. Nature, as in recognition of the non-biological processes of the environment (most notably by the "natural sciences"), their widespread use as metaphors (the "winds of change", "tide of public opinion", for example), and the sense in which they can be understood as implying a form of fundamental cognitive integration and mirroring, as articulated by authors such as Gregory Bateson (Mind and Nature: a necessary unity, 1979), Henryk Skolimowski (The Participatory Mind: a new theory of knowledge and of the universe, 1994) and David Abram (The Spell of the Sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world, 1996), and separately discussed (Self-reflective Embodiment of Transdisciplinary Integration (SETI): the universal criterion of species maturity? 2008).

    There is an unfortunate tendency to focus on "order" in nature as a static attribute thereby reducing recognition of the degree to which that order emerges from dynamic processes. This semblance is the case with the comprehensive overview offered by Christopher Alexander (The Nature of Order: an essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, 2003-4). [see clarification below]

  4. Biology, as in current recognition, through biomimetics and biomimicry, of process-related insights of relevance to the human condition. As with the apparent static focus of Alexander, the dynamic from which forms emerge is however less evident -- even in the remarkable review by Keith Critchlow (The Hidden Geometry of Flowers: living rhythms, form and number, 2012). By contrast, as might be expected, particular attention to dynamics is currently given to the complexity of swarm behaviour and collective animal behaviour.

  5. Verbally-related interaction, involving variously familiar processes dependent on inter-personal skills:
    • conversation / dialogue: understanding of conversation as involving processes of transformation, as separately discussed (Transforming the Art of Conversation: conversing as the transformative science of development, 2012). These can be reframed in proprioceptive terms, as articulated by Steven M. Rosen (Practicing Proprioceptive Dialogue).
    • persuasion / interrogation: understood in terms of the extensively explored processes by which resistance is transformed through persuasion into conversion, including the devices of brainwashing, propaganda and public relations. These may of course vary to a degree according to whether the intention is framed (and perceived) as friendly, therapeutic, ideological, commercial, or otherwise (cf. Roger Fisher, et. al, Getting to Yes: negotiating agreement without giving in, 1981)
    • humour: understood in terms of the widely explored processes which enable the humour of a situation to become apparent and for a joke to "work" (cf. Recognized Role of Humour -- in politics, leadership, religion and creativity, 2005; Matthew M. Hurley, et al., Inside Jokes: using humor to reverse-engineer the mind, 2011)
    • game-playing, as well-recognized amongst those mobilized in support of any collective project, as is typical amongst those within any institution, between its departments, or in any process of inter-institutional, inter-disciplinary or inter-faith "collaboration". In interpersonal relations the processes have been extensively explored through the transactional analysis instigated by Eric Berne (Games People Play, 1964). A "game" is then understood as a series of transactions that is complementary (reciprocal), ulterior, and proceeds towards a predictable outcome. These may be characterized by a switch in roles of players towards the end of the process. Many such games have been identified, with each game tending towards a very similar pattern in terms of the number of players or roles, the rules of the game, and its goals.

  6. Credibility and creditworthiness, involving variously familiar processes through which either may be manipulated and transformed:
  7. Performance art, widely familiar processes, to whatever extent they are appreciated and understood: These are possibly to be seen as a valuable feature of governance of the future (cf. Aesthetics of Governance in the Year 2490, 1990)

  8. Physical interaction, widely familiar processes for which skills in transformation typically require kinesthetic intelligence, as noted above (Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, The Primacy of Movement, 2011; Mark Johnson, The Meaning of the Body: aesthetics of human understanding, 2008):
    • games / sport: following recognition of biomimicry (and, by extension, technomimicry), insights into ball sports in particular could be extended in the light of "ludomimicry" -- following the critical arguments of Roger Caillois (The Definition of Play and the Classification of Games, 2006) regarding those of Johan Huizinga (Homo Ludens: a study of the play-element in culture, 1950), as discussed by Andrew Brown (Agon, Alea, Mimicry and Ilinx, Embodied Knowers).

      As might be expected, a degree of mathematical insight has been brought to bear on team building and the effective operation of teams. This is most evident in the analysis of passing patterns in ball games, possibly to be understood in terms of forms of transformation.
    • "aerobatics", highlighting in each case the range of distinct transformations with which a practitioner is familiar, perhaps to the point of naming them, or aspiring to perform them:
      • gymnastics, diving and skydiving
      • vehicle aerobatics:
        • aircraft maneuvers, namely flight paths putting aircraft in unusual attitudes, enumerated in the Aresti Catalog. Most of these can be entered either erect or inverted, flown backwards or have extra rolls added.
        • other vehicles, namely the use of a variety of technologies enabling aerobatics to be variously performed: skateboarding, motorbike aerobatics, bicycle aerobatics (bike acrobatics)

  9. Strategy, in which transformation processes ("moves") are skillfully employed, using surprise and deception (preferably with elegance) to achieve competitive advantage: It could be argued that so-called "wicked problems" are effectively engaged in strategic games with the initiatives of governance (cf. Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable, 2007)

  10. Environmental interaction / technology (I), with which there has long been widespread familiarity:
    • gardening: for which the transforming and sustaining processes are widely understood and explored. The transformational preoccupations of permaculture are of particular relevance.
    • cooking: this involves a set of transformational processes which are widely understood and explored through recipes. Metaphorical use is made of these processes as in the accounting phrase: "cooking the books"
    • beverage-making: as with cooking, this involves a set of transformational processes which are widely understood and explored, most notably with respect to beer-making and wine-making. Metaphorical use is made of "old wine into new bottles" and "new wine into old bottles"
    • clothes-making: of special interest as the origin of "pattern", and the process by which raw materials are transformed into what can be worn and considered attractive
    • arts and crafts: most notably the processes whereby raw materials are transformed into desirable artefacts (ceramics, jewelry, paintings, etc).

  11. Environmental interaction / technology (II), using transformation processes arising, most notably, from the industrial revolution:
    • energy transformation (water, wind, wave, solar, wood, coal, nuclear)
    • manufacture of artefacts, especially including the transformation of materials through chemical processes
    • electricity and electronics (discussed below)

  12. Psycho-biological transformations:

Each domain may be understood as offering a potential metaphor of the other -- but with each potentially offering a different kind of cognitive engagement -- and with every probability of each not being credible, meaningful or relevant to another.

With respect to any underlying pattern of transformation, there is a "cognitive egality" to the domains as experienced, contrasting with any "cognitive elitism" (or "pecking order") which may endeavour to rank one domain as superior (or more fundamental) than another. This is consistent with the insights of any general systems approach (noted above). It is also fundamental to the arguments of Paul Feyerabend (Against Method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge, 1975; Conquest of Abundance: a tale of abstraction versus the richness of being, 1999). These insights might be explored to clarify how such domains emerge and get distinguished.


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All | PDF] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]