You are here

In Further Quest of Meta-Union ?

Interplay of generic dimensions of any union of international associations (Part #1)


Development of the argument in Dynamic Reframing of "Union": implications for the coherence of knowledge, social organization and personal identity (2007). The argument below includes, and extends, a separate simpler presentation (In Quest of "Meta-Union"? 2007)
Strategic initiatives exemplifying characteristic styles of "union", "inter-" and "associations"
Conventional preoccupations exemplifying characteristic styles of "union", "inter-" and "associations"
WH-questions exemplifying characteristic styles of "union", "inter-" and "associations"
Conclusion
References

[Parts: Next | Last | All ] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]


Strategic initiatives exemplifying characteristic styles of "union", "inter-" and "associations"

Table 1 is a (very tentative) exercise in generalizing the significance of "union", "international" and "associations". The upper portion of the table highlights "union" as emergent identity, "inter-" as indicative of a generic form of bonding across boundaries, with "associations" as the content of what might be potentially interrelated by the previous two. The domains of the Mandelbrot set are used experimentally as metaphors to distinguish these, together with contrasting traditional symbols.

The table highlights the particular features of the strategic initiatives (separately described) that correspond to generic understandings of "union", "inter-" and "associations". Again these are tentatively associated with two quite distinct sets of metaphor, namely those of the fundamental forces of physics and those of traditional categories. It is possible that the 12 zones of that portion of the table are indicative of 12 "languages" appropriate to sustainable governance [more] -- as an extension of Edward de Bono's metaphorical argument for "6 hats" and "6 shoes" in strategic management dialogue .

The references below the table point to related explorations of these issues -- although other references are indicated as resources on the websites of the four strategic initiatives linked below.

Table 1: Distinction between 4 strategic initiatives in terms of their exemplification of 3 ordering characteristics [tentative] Union (Inter-) Associations
emergent
identity
bonding (across boundaries) potential associations
strategic initiatives metaphors      
. . Mandelbrot
set domains
order chaos/order boundary chaos, complexity (uncertainty)
. traditional
categories/
symbols
. cardinal fixed mutable
. . fundamental
forces
. . .
Union of Imaginative Associations air,
man
electro-magnetism coherent (design) concept / pattern (unforeseen) connections significance
Cognitive
Fusion Reactor

(ITER-8)
fire,
lion
strong
nuclear
configuration enabling improbable focus /
tail-biting self-reference
arrays requisite diversity
University of
Earth
earth,
bull
gravity viable ecosystemic integrity / biodiversity as a self-sustaining process /
"grounded" insight
relationships /
feedback loops
biodiversity
Union of the
Whys
water,
eagle
weak nuclear existentially coherent self-questioning / paradoxical transcendence (catastrophe theory, koans) (intriguing) challenges to assumptions of coherence /
riddles / humour
inexplicables / incompatible insights / catastrophe / tragedy

In an effort to interrelate the four strategic initiatives in Table 1 in the light of their three-fold attributes, the logo used in various orientations for each of them calls for some further comment. [Note that access to the websites of each initiative can be achieved by clicking on the corresponding coloured circle -- as is the case from each of those websites]

Laubauru symbol (superposition of right and left-facing variants)

The image has the merit of holding the 4 contrasting initiatives, each indicated in a 3-fold manner. Arguably the circles holding each of the 4 can be associated with the particular understandings of "union" -- with the particular "associations" in the outermost (coloured) smaller circle within, whilst the "inter-" dimension is held by the (uncoloured) inner circle. Faintly circumscribing the whole is a circle indicative of some form of "meta-union". In an effort to focus these concerns on engagement in immediate global challenges, the symbol (derived from the Basque lauburu ) was first used in a "playful exploration of ecopsychological embodiment of climate change pathways" (cf Playfully Changing the Prevailing Climate of Opinion Climate change as focal metaphor of effective global governance, 2005).

Of course such a 2 dimensional image raises interesting questions as to whether an appropriate "roundtable" representative of the 12 "languages" would be more fruitfully represented in 3 dimensions to avoid diminishing (or privileging) the signifance of any.

The implications of such a representation have been discussed separately (Union of Intelligible Associations: remembering dynamic identity through a dodecameral mind, 2005) -- notably with respect to its implementation (or recognition) in a virtual environment (Spherical Configuration of Interlocking Roundtables: Internet enhancement of global self-organization through patterns of dialogue, 1998).

net enhancement of global self-organization through patterns of dialogue, 1998).


[Parts: Next | Last | All ] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]