You are here

Deprecation of potential correspondences: 16-fold patterns?


Coping Capacity of Governance as Dangerously Questionable (Part #14)


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]


As noted above, Fabien Schang (An Arithmetization of Logical Oppositions, 2017) makes reference to "blatant analogies" between the pattern of logical connectives and classical Chinese thinking. The history of the mathematical discovery of the so-called "monster group" arose from recognition of its unexpected connection to modular functions -- a correspondence recognized as monstrous moonshine. Arguably there is a case for seeking such improbable connections in domains of relevance to governance (Potential Psychosocial Significance of Monstrous Moonshine: an exceptional form of symmetry as a Rosetta stone for cognitive frameworks, 2007). Recognition of correspondences is readily framed as suspicious by many disciplines, although variously valued (Theories of Correspondences -- and potential equivalences between them in correlative thinking, 2007).

There is therefore a case for "confronting" the full pattern of 16 Boolean connectives with other 16-fold patterns -- however disparate -- which have acquired fundamental significance to the manner in which the world is ordered. One argument in support of this is provided by cognitive psychology (George Lakoff and Rafael E. Núñez, Where Mathematics Comes From: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, 2000).

The question is why 16? Especially with respect to systemic understanding of the challenges of governance, why:

Speculatively, are there 16 types of such distinctions to be fruitfully recognized? Why the absence of governmental plans articulated in this way at this time -- with some rare (if not strange) exceptions:

Suitably provocative candidates for confrontation are the 16-fold standard model of particle physics (minus the Higgs boson) and the set of 16 UN Sustainable Development Goals (minus the coordinating 17th). In systemic terms there is in an interesting comparison to be made between the 17th SDG and the Higgs boson. The Higgs boson and the ambition of goal coordination could be understood as equally elusive. It is strange to note that no attempt appears to have been made to configure either the set of goals or the set of particles in a three-dimensional visualization to facilitate wider comprehenion. Nor does any attempt seem to have been made to seek correspondences with the pattern of logical connectives. Of relevance to the "problematic" relationship between 16-fold and 17-fold is recognition of 17 ways to arrange a motif regularly in a plane (The 17 Plane-symmetries).

In the following exercise the first two images are reproduced from Confrontation of alternative mappings in Metaphorical Insights from the Patterns of Academic Disciplines (2012). The image on the right derives from a separate exercise (Interplay of Sustainable Development Goals through Rubik Cube Variations: engaging otherwise with what people find meaningful, 2017).

Juxtaposition of 16-fold patterns potentially implying correspondencs (experimental)
Standard model of particle physics
(minus Higgs Boson)
Chinese pattern of tetragrams Sustainable Development Goals
(minus 17th coordination goal)
16-fold Standard model of particle physics (minus Higgs Boson) 16-fold Chinese pattern of tetragrams 16-fold Sustainable Development Goals (minus 17th coordination goal)
Reproduced from Wikipedia   Adapted from Wikipedia

Some justification for the approach is provided by the following (Solomon W. Golomb, Rubik's Cube and Quarks: twists on the eight corner cells of Rubik's Cube provide a model for many aspects of quark behavior, American Scientist, 70, 1982, 3; T. Csörgö, Qbe: Quark Matter on Rubik's Cube, 2017). The latter provides a detailed illustrated description of development of the technique for educational purposes:

Quarks can be represented on the faces of the 3x3 Rubik's cube with the help of a symbolic representation of quarks and anti-quarks, that was delevoped originally for a deck of elementary particle cards, called Quark Matter Card Game. Cubing the cards leads to a model of the nearly per-fect fluid of Quark Matter on Rubik's cube, or Qbe, which can be utilized to provide hands-on experience with the high entropy density, overall colorn eutrality and net baryon free, nearly perfect fluid nature of Quark Matter.


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]