Disparate Strategic Possibilities Dangerously Neglected (Part #3)
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]
The case of "work", clarified above by many references, is indicative of a more general issue. In a time of systemic global crisis there is little effort by disciplines and agencies to cultivate a posture calling into question the nature and scope of the categories by which their methodologies have long been defined. The consequence is that it is that same definition which may well be constraining their current relevance to the challenges by which they are faced -- especially when other sectors are dependent on their insights. The point has been made by the policy scientist
Geoffrey Vickers:
a trap is a function of the nature of the trapped (
Freedom in a Rocking Boat: changing values in an unstable society, 1972). The point is also emphasized by the vain efforts of some to reframe an economic system which is proving to be dangerously less than fit for purpose.
The argument above endeavours to show that "economics" has effectively excluded dimensions which would render its principles more applicable to a system understood in global terms -- especially one faced with environmental challenges. Worse still the definition of "labour", as enshrined in the mandate and preoccupations of the ILO, precludes consideration of a very large proportion of work and workers characterizing the environment in which humanity is enmeshed. It is then questionable whether the insights of economics are of sufficiently general scope to enable the global system to be effectively addressed -- as various initiatives claim mistakenly to do.
Given that case, the question is then with what methodology can other instances be found of categories too narrowly defined -- too a potentially dangerous or unfruitful degree in this period. However (necessarily) speculative, examples might include:
- Extending the scientific worldview and methodology: As argued by the Galileo Commission in order to recognize and integrate neglected psychosocial dimensions (Harald Walach, Beyond a Materialist Worldview: towards an expanded science, 2019) and as an aspect of the case for fso-called Science 2.0.
It is unfortunate that "science" is as impotent as religion in responding to problematically divisive dynamics -- and systematically avoids its acknowledgement, as may be variously argued (Challenges of Science Upheld as an Exclusive Mode of Inquiry, 2021; Â Challenges More Difficult for Science than Going to Mars, 2014; Metascience Enabling Upgrades to the Scientific Process, 2014;Â Knowledge Processes Neglected by Science, 2012)
- Underground accommodation: Neglected options for subterranean habitats in dense urban areas faced with major housing shortages (From Lateral Thinking to Voluminous Thinking, 2007)
- Extending understandings of "health" -- beyond the narrow focus of the World Health Organization, entangled as it is becoming in the medical-industrial complex, and faced with widespread erosion of a sense of well-being and the recourse to drugs obtained illegally:
- Applying a health framework to the problematic conditions of an "unhealthy" information society:
- Highlighting and interweaving insights from the cultures of the world: The conceptual resources they represent, suggests the need for a more systematic interrelationship between those insights and associated humour, as variously indicated by:
- Anticipating a surprising singularity in some form, as discussed in Emerging Memetic Singularity in the Global Knowledge Society (2009), indicating the possibility of:
Especially provocative are: - Appreciative engagement with ignorance and disagreement: Especially in the light of singularities challenging comprehension:
- Ignorance, the unsayable and the unsaid:
- Unknowns and incomprehension:
- Disagreement:
- Evil:
- Extraterrestrial perspective:
- Navigation of knowledge and experiential space
- Mathematical theology
- Reframing "employment" and "unemployment": The tardy recognition by economics of the "work" associated with "housework" is indicative of its failure to recognize that of "voluntary work", slavery, prison labour, or "homework". There is a case for identifying whether a person can ever be appropriately understood to be "unemployed" -- as notably suggested by meditation, bearing witness, and waiting:
- Reframing "land", "property" and "ownership": Current understandings of "land", and their major implications for violent disagreeement, can be called into question as instances of misplaced concreteness. This is evident to a degree through widespread recognition of a "field" of activity and the non-material relation to it in the case of many disciplines. People can have a special relationship to land without any need to own it exclusively as property -- or even to access it, as notably evident in the case of symbolic locations (Jerusalem as a Symbolic Singularity, 2017).
The relationship may be particularly cultivated by a diaspora, whether or not this implies citizenship or voting rights. Unconventional relationships to the land are notably cultivated by indigenous peoples. Unresolved issues are also evident in relation to the responsibilities associated with property and ownership: - Hypothetical future recognition of dangerously constrained present-day comprehension: Given the bemused condescension with which insights of past centuries are perceived at present, it is instructive to consider how the future may view prevailing assumptions -- especially those deemed unquestionable:
- Reframing the UN's Sustainable development Goals: The examples above suggest that some of the UN's SDGs, might be fruitfully reframed as inappropriately mistaken instances of misplaced concreteness.
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]