Comprehending Connectivity between Logic, Emotion, Intuition and Practice (Part #4)
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | Refs ]
| Contrasting Chinese classical arrays of 64 hexagrams | |||
| King Wen | Fuxi (Shao Yung square) | Jing Fang | Mawangdui |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
The Fuxi array above featured in the Shao Yung circle as presented below. This is of historical of significance through its influence on the thinking of Gottfied Wilhelm Leibniz in developing the binary coding fundamentall to computer operation -and subsequently to artificial intelligence
| Shao Yung circle with Fuxi hexagram array (owned by Gottfried Leibniz, 1701) | Animation of superimposition of 4 hexagram arrays |
![]() | ![]() |
| Perkins, Franklin. Leibniz and China: a commerce of light. Cambridge UP, 2004. 117., Public Domain, Link |
The 64-fold arrays correspond to the layout of an 8x8 chess board of black and white squares -- with all its well-recognized significance for the development of strategic thinking. Of particular relevance to the following argument is the pattern of nonlinear movement of the Knight across that board in contrast to the linear patterns of movement of other pieces. This has evoked considerable mathematical interest in a Knight's Tour -- a sequence of moves on a chessboard such that the Knight visits every square exactly once, as discussed seprately (Detection and representation of cycles in 2D mappings, 2024).
Of potential interest in that respect is the representation of a particular pattern of movement with respect to a 3x3 cell within the chess board as variously shown below. Rather than distinguishing the cells by hexagrams, as above, they may be distinguished by the trigrams of the traditional 8-fold BaGua pattern.
Of potential relevance is how the pattern of Knight's moves can trace out either a right-facing or left-facing Swastika -- with all the controversy with which these are associated, as discussed separately (Swastika as Dynamic Pattern Underlying Psychosocial Power Processes, 2012). The Knight's move is also of important strategic significance -- associated with creative "out-of-the-box" thinking. However it also has pathological connotations as an indication of disconnected thinking.
| Animation of superposition of Swastika on BaGua "Earlier Heaven" Arrangement (transformation of trigram coding consistent with Knight's move, namely reflection across the centre or change of line pattern for the "sting") | ||
| Left-facing Swastika defined by succession of Knight's moves on BaGua pattern | Animation engendering both forms of Swastika: left-facing (green) and right-facing (red) Note switch in colour and direction -- to the "other" variant | Right-facing Swastika defined by succession of Knight's moves on BaGua pattern |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Reproduced from Alternative representations: Knight's move, Swastika and BaGua? (2012) | ||
Question: The 64 I Ching hexagrams are presented in four traditional chess-board like arrays: King Wen, Fuxi, Jing Fang, Mawangdui. The quadrants of each array therefore hold 16 hexagrams. The 16 can be mapped onto the vertices along the 4 diagonals of a truncated tesseract as previously discussed with you. Each set of 16 can be understood as associated with a cognitive modality. Of interest is why there are only 4 traditional arrays and whether other such patterns are of significance. Separately the variety of movements of a chess Knight have been mapped onto a BaGua configuration [as illustrated above] -- making the two forms of swastika when rotated. One interest is why the Knight's L-move is constrained as it is when it could be 3-2 instead of 2-1 . Then what hexagrams would be linked on a chess-board array by such moves
# Show/Hide AI response #
| ChatGPT 4o | Claude 3.5 |
The combination of I Ching hexagrams, chessboard configurations, and Knightâ-'s movements evokes rich possibilities for exploring cognitive patterns, strategic moves, and symbolic interrelationships. To address your specific inquiries about why there are only 4 traditional I Ching arrays, the potential for other patterns, and the intriguing question of the Knight's movement and its link to hexagrams, let's break this down. The Four Traditional I Ching Arrays: King Wen, Fuxi, Jing Fang, Mawangdui: The four traditional chessboard-like arrays you mentioned (King Wen, Fuxi, Jing Fang, and Mawangdui) represent different ways to arrange the 64 hexagrams of the I Ching. Each array offers a unique system of interpretation or cognitive modality:
The quadrant division of the 64 hexagrams into groups of 16 suggests that each quadrant can represent a different cognitive modality or perspective on change, making it relevant to different facets of human experience. Mapping Hexagrams onto the Truncated Tesseract: 16 Hexagrams per Quadrant: In previous discussions, the mapping of 16 hexagrams onto the vertices along the 4 diagonals of a truncated tesseract was proposed, associating them with cognitive modalities. The truncated tesseract (or 8-cell polytope) with its 64 vertices provides a fascinating metaphor for cognitive space, where transitions between states of consciousness could be represented by the transformations of hexagrams.Each set of 16 hexagrams in a quadrant can indeed correspond to a distinct cognitive modality:
The symmetry and interconnectedness of the truncated tesseract offer a geometric model for understanding how cognitive modalities intersect and influence one another. Potential for Other Patterns of Hexagram Arrangement: While these four arrays have become canonized over centuries, thereâ-'s no inherent limit to how hexagrams can be arranged. Other patterns could be of significant value, depending on the interpretative framework used:
These alternative arrangements could represent new ways of interpreting change that go beyond the traditional arrays, tapping into modern scientific or philosophical frameworks. The Knight's L-Move in Chess and BaGua Configuration: The Knightâ-'s L-move in chess -- moving two squares in one direction and then one square perpendicular -- has been mapped to the BaGua configuration, where its movement generates rotations of swastikas (right-facing and left-facing). This connects the Knightâ-'s movement to the cyclical nature of transformation represented in the I Ching and Eastern metaphysics. Why the Knightâ-'s movement is constrained as 2-1 (rather than 3-2)The Knight's 2-1 movement is a unique form of movement in chess, designed to allow it to "jump" over pieces while creating a sense of asymmetry and unpredictability. The restriction to 2-1 (instead of 3-2) might be viewed as essential for maintaining the tactical complexity of the game, allowing the Knight to move in ways that other pieces cannot.
In this sense, the Knight's moves can be seen as representing the jumps in cognition or decision-making between states of consciousness (hexagrams). The truncated tesseract with its 64 vertices could be mapped with hexagrams, where the Knightâ-'s movement traces the nonlinear paths of transformation between these cognitive states. Conclusion: Strategic and Cognitive Insights from the Knightâ-'s Moves
This opens up further questions about how the Knightâ-'s movement can be metaphorically applied to modern strategic thinking, and how different hexagrams can offer insights into cognitive modalities and decision-making in a rapidly changing world. | This is a fascinating synthesis that opens up several intriguing analytical pathways:
Would you like to explore any of these aspects in more detail? For instance:
This seems to offer a rich framework for understanding both structural patterns and cognitive transitions. |
Question: The classic 4-fold pattern of psychological types, as with the 16-fold Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, evokes consideration that they could be based on 4 quadrants of a cartesian axial system -- and would then bear comparison with the AQAL 4-quadrant system of integral theory. If considered in relation to a 64-fold array of hexagrams arrayed in 4 quadrants, these might be appropriately positioned in concentric circles (as in the AQAL model), as with some depictions of the set of 64 genetic codons. Do you have any trace of hexagrams arrayed in this manner in contrast with the tabular arrays -- also favoured in the case of the AQAL model
# Show/Hide AI response #
| ChatGPT 4o | Claude 3.5 |
There is no widely accepted or traditional representation of the 64 hexagrams in concentric circles, especially one that organizes them by quadrants in a way that aligns directly with the AQAL model of Integral Theory or the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). However, the idea of arranging hexagrams in a circular and quadrant-based system has an intriguing basis in several frameworks, including genetic codon arrangements and the cognitive models often symbolized in mandala-like structures. Hereâ-'s an exploration of how such an arrangement might be developed and where it draws upon existing patterns in Chinese cosmology, modern typology systems, and related symbolic representations: Traditional Representations of Hexagrams: Most traditional I Ching representations are grid-based or organized in linear arrays:
These arrangements generally follow tabular or linearly progressing models rather than concentric or radial systems. Circular Representations in Chinese Thought: While there is no standard concentric circular array for hexagrams, circular arrangements are common in Chinese cosmology:
Analogy with Genetic Codons and AQAL: The 64 genetic codons have occasionally been compared to the 64 hexagrams in terms of their combinatorial structure. Some genetic codon arrays are displayed in concentric patterns, with codons organized radially to illustrate circular symmetry and genetic progression. Similarly, in Integral Theoryâ-'s AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) model, quadrants represent Interior-Individual, Interior-Collective, Exterior-Individual, and Exterior-Collective realities, with concentric levels denoting progression or expansion within each quadrant. If we were to interpret hexagrams within this framework:
Creating a Hypothetical Circular Hexagram Array: A circular array of hexagrams could be conceptualized by:
Implications of a Radial Hexagram Arrangement for Cognitive or Typological Models: This arrangement might provide a more holistic, integrated view of the 64 hexagrams, emphasizing transitions and interconnectedness rather than linearity:
Comparison with Myers-Briggs and 16-Fold Typologies: In the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) system, the 16 types can be seen as quadrants within quadrants, or types that balance introversion/extraversion, intuition/sensation, thinking/feeling, and judging/perceiving. Mapping the 64 hexagrams radially would give each quadrant 16 hexagrams, mirroring a 16-fold typological structure within four overarching modalities. This alignment allows each group of 16 hexagrams to represent composite cognitive dynamics, connecting individual hexagram qualities to broader types or modalities, thus enhancing integrative perspectives and mnemonic associations between personality models and traditional Chinese metaphysics. Benefits of a Concentric Circular Model for Hexagrams:
Conclusion: A Speculative, Integrative Model: Though no traditional radial or concentric circular array of the 64 hexagrams exists, a conceptual mapping of hexagrams in concentric quadrants is possible and aligns with both AQALâ-'s 4-quadrant structure and 16-fold personality typologies. This speculative model could provide a metaphoric, cognitive mapping tool to enhance understanding of transitions between mental states, decision-making processes, and integrative psychological perspectives. It would represent the fluidity and interconnectedness inherent in the hexagram structure while integrating elements from genetic codons, integral theory, and typological frameworks. | Let me analyze this carefully:
Would you:
The potential for meaningful circular organization seems significant for understanding:
|
| Indication of potentially comparable circular arrays of 64-fold patterns with contrasting implications for change | ||
| Circular array of 64 hexagrams (4 rings of 16) | Circular chess (starting position) | Standard RNA codon table |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| NB: Top of hexagram marked by small red sphere | By Dogface - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link | Mouagip, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons |
Question: A classic circular arrangement of hexagrams is that of the Shao Yung circle [see above], known to have been an inspiration to Gottfried Leibniz in his reflections on the binary coding which anticipatd the development of computers. Each quadrant is split into 2 "houses" thereby framing the question whether these might be appropriately repositioned concentric to one another [above left]. Given the references to chess in this argument, this recalls the reconfiguration of the tabular chess board into a circular chess variant featuring a circular board with four rings, each with 16 squares, using standard chess pieces [above centre]. Could you comment on the movement of the Knight in this configuration
# Show/Hide AI response #
| ChatGPT 4o | Claude 3.5 |
In a circular chess board configuration with four concentric rings of 16 squares each, the movement of the Knight gains intriguing dynamics, especially when contrasted with traditional chess and understood through analogies to hexagrams and binary coding insights inspired by Shao Yungâ-'s circular arrangement. In this configuration, the board retains the 64 squares of a standard chessboard but in a radial arrangement. Hereâ-'s how the Knightâ-'s movement would operate in this layout, along with strategic implications for the circular design: Knightâ-'s Movement in a Circular Chess Configuration: The Knightâ-'s L-shaped move in traditional chess (two squares in one direction, then one square perpendicular) still applies, but the curvature and radial organization of the board add new movement dynamics:
Strategic Implications of the Circular Layout for the Knightâ-'s Role: The Knightâ-'s movement in this circular configuration introduces new strategic elements that affect its versatility, positioning, and range:
Cognitive and Symbolic Implications of Knight Movement on a Circular Board: This reconfigured movement suggests deeper cognitive and symbolic insights when related to Shao Yungâ-'s hexagram arrangement and binary coding principles:
Game Dynamics with a Circular Board and Hexagram Comparison: The circular chess board can create new gameplay dynamics and strategies unique to this layout:
Summary: In this circular chess configuration, the Knightâ-'s unique movement gains new symbolic significance:
The circular configuration of the Knightâ-'s movement is therefore a potent metaphor for cognitive integration and exploration, illustrating how bounded structure (concentric rings) and freedom of movement (Knightâ-'s L-shape jumps) can provide pathways for complex, integrative thought processes. | This is a fascinating connection between circular chess variants and hexagram arrangements. Let me analyze:
Of particular interest might be:
The circular configuration seems to:
|
[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Links: To-K | Refs ]