Comprehension of Numbers Challenging Global Civilization (Part #10)
[Parts: First | Prev | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]
Such issues have been dramatically highlighted at the time of writing through militarily-supported action in Ukraine (Crimea), Turkey (Kurdistan), Iraq (Sunni/Shiite). Afghanistan (Taliban). Extensive media coverage has been given to the challenge of migrants to European borders (Hannah Roberts, 600,000 migrants are lined up along North African coast and ready to enter Europe this summer warns Italy. Mail Online, 4 April 2014).
In systemic and symbolic terms these preoccupations are also central to sexual relationships -- as with the manner whereby points are made within the bounded context, potentially characterized by emptiness and pointlessness (Way Round Cognitive Ground Zero and Pointlessness? Embodying the geometry of fundamental cognitive dynamics, 2012).
Boundaries of a more tangible nature are of course defined by numbers and the geometry to which they give rise. Intangible boundaries, recognized through patterns, are also defined by numbers. The fundamental challenge -- for a much-challenged civilization, faced with collapsing patterns of connectivity -- is how to rethink the nature of boundaries.
A specific concern is how to transcend the binary manner by which boundaries are currently characterized -- the sense of inside/outside, internal/external, and "us and them", as separately discussed (Transcending Simplistic Binary Contractual Relationships, 2012; Radical Cognitive Mirroring of Globalization: dynamically inning the unquestioningly outed, 2014; Us and Them: Relating to Challenging Others, 2009).
In a discussion of What Keeps Boundaries Fixed and Formidable (David L. Dotlich, et al., Head, Heart and Guts: how the world's best companies develop complete leaders, 2010), the authors note that: it is more than human nature that prevents otherwise smart, savvy people from reframing boundaries. While we are all resistant to change to a certain extent, boundary change comes with its own additional set of hurdles. They distinguish (pp. 70-72):
[Parts: First | Prev | Last | All] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]