Creative agreements and business models

Reframing Strategic Dilemmas through 12 Modes (Part #6)

[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All | PDF] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx ]

Such possibilities continue to be demonstrated through a wide variety of innovative local initiatives and open source projects. The challenge is to enable a systematic exploration of such possibilities and to anchor them in new forms of contract and accounting system.

• Spherical Accounting: using geometry to embody developmental integrity, 2004
• Towards a New Order of Community Participation, 1997
• Being Employed by the Future: reframing the immediate challenge of sustainable community, 1996
• Gardening Sustainable Psycommunities: recognizing the psycho-social integrities of the future, 1995
• Patterning disagreement, 1995
• Using Disagreements for Superordinate Frame Configuration, 1992
• Higher Orders of Inter-sectoral Consensus, 1991

With respect to reframing strategic dilemmas, neural networks are now being used to detect unusual strategies, as discussed by David E. Moriarty and Risto Miikkulainen (Discovering Complex Othello Strategies through Evolutionary Neural Networks, 2000). They argue that their approach could also be used to find new strategies and heuristics in other domains including planning. Hendrik Moraal (Counterintuitive behaviour in games based on spin models, 2000) has shown that mixing of two losing strategies may lead to a winning one, but also that the mixing of two winning ones may lead to a loss. Mixing of a losing and a winning strategy may give unexpected results.