Eliciting significance from symbol dynamics in 2D and 3D


Cognitive Implications in 3D of Triadic Symbols Valued in 2D (Part #2)


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Gallery] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]


The point of departure for this exploration has been consideration of rotational dynamics of the triskelion, illustrated below, as previously presented with respect to reframing "wheels of governance" (Central pattern generators and higher order values? 2017).

Rotational wheel-like animations of the triskelion
Rotational wheel-like animations of the triskelion Rotational wheel-like animations of the triskelion
Rotations generated from images in Wikipedia

The argument has been variously developed with respect to other symbols considered to be of fundamental significance in some way:

The possibly of unexplored implications of the use of such symbols at the present time is evident in the case of The Pentagon, or the logo of NATO. These therefore lend themselves to exploration of how they might be understood through forms of higher dimensionality (Envisaging NATO Otherwise -- in 3D and 4D? Potentially hidden faces of global strategy highlighted through polyhedra, 2017). Whereas mapping, most notably of the globe, focuses on projection from 3D to 2D, the latter addresses the seemingly unexplored challenge of inferring a 3D form from one in 2D (Explanation as interplay of projection and "conjection"? and Surrogates of "conjection" as an unrecognized cognitive process?).

There is particular value in exploring triadic symbols such as the triskelion -- beyond that noted above -- namely the manner in which it is implied by the relation between the three primary Abrahamic religions. Necessarily a matter of great controversy, it is their conflictual relations which are so characteristic of current global dynamics, as may be variously discussed (Root Irresponsibility for Major World Problems: the unexamined role of Abrahamic faiths in sustaining unrestrained population growth, 2007; Systemic Reliance of World Religions on Human Sacrifice: covert use of fatal conflict to ensure vital resource management, 2014).

Curiously, beyond the motivation of any of the Abrahamic religions (despite efforts at interfaith dialogue), the triadic nature of their relationship goes systematically unexplored, as can be otherwise reframed (Triangulation of Incommensurable Concepts for Global Configuration, 2011). There is seemingly no symbol of that relationship as a whole, irrespective of the existence of distinctive geometric symbols for each of them.

Another approach to the challenge of these divisive times is through identifying a pattern through which a variety of such conventional symbols might be interrelated (Dynamic Exploration of Value Configurations: interrelating traditional cultural symbols through animation, 2008; video).


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All] [Gallery] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]