You are here

Clues to engaging with the unknown


University of Ignorance (Part #7)


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All | PDF] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]


The points above frame a dysfunctional dynamic between knowing and not-knowing. The question is whether there are imaginative indications of a healthier dynamic that is readily comprehensible. Suggestive possibilities include:

  • Sexual intercourse: Given its fundamental role in society as a virtually universal preoccupation with which most are familiar, there is every possibility that that dynamic offers valuable insights into knowing-not-knowing. The possibility is evident from one biblical use of "knowing" and resistance to "grasping" as previously suggested (Beyond Harassment of Reality and Grasping Future Possibilities: learnings from sexual harassment as a metaphor, 1996). The mysterious nature of "not-knowing" is the theme of repeated commentary on the mutual incomprehensibility of the sexes. In the process of intercourse a complex dynamic between knowing and not-knowing can be readily experienced -- potentially culminating in that of consummation. This dynamic remains to be sensitively explored, as noted elsewhere (Reframing the Dynamics of Engaging with Otherness: triadic correspondences between Topology, Kama Sutra and I Ching, 2011).

    There is a profoundly tragic irony to strategic consideration of the crises of the time by science, as the intentionally preferred process of "knowing", in that the process of sexual intercourse is systematically excluded from any "systematic analysis" of drivers of those crises, as separately argued (Scientific Gerrymandering of Boundaries of Overpopulation Debate, 2012).

  • Remembering and Forgetting: The widely experienced process of "remembering" can be readily associated with that of "knowing". Similarly the process of "forgetting" can be readily associated with "ignoring". Any focus on the "knowledge" remembered or the "ignorance" associated with the forgotten, ensures a non-experiential distance from "remembering" and "forgetting" respectively. Especially meaningful are the transitions widely experienced between one and the other through partial remembrance.
  • Unlearning: This has been variously recommended as a means of engaging with the unknown. Indications are evident from the resources offered by the Institute of Unlearning. It argues that a great deal of energy is expended by those in power to craft an illusory world designed to benefit only a very small percentage of the population. The many mind-traps and emotional webs crafted by these perpetrators have left humanity in a largely disempowered, though apparently freely chosen, state.

    A complementary perspective is offered by Erica Dhawan (Business Schools Need To Focus On Unlearning, Forbes, 13 June 2012) arguing that MBAs are trained to focus on what they learn rather than how or why they learn. In this light, business leaders should reflect on their learning processes to unlearn the old patterns that stand in the way of authentic leadership.

    Durelle Price (Unlearning 101, 21 February 2009) Albert Einstein, icon of intellect and insight, said "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." Universities are focused on higher learning when perhaps they should promote a course entitled Unlearning 101. Course objectives would include: remove cultural filters; abandon destructive behaviors; and stimulate individual creativity and ingenuity.

    For Prasad Kaipa (Unlearning, Mithya Institute of Learning, 1999), unlearning is not any form of reframing or refreezing. These all focus on an end state whereas unlearning is about moving away from something rather than moving towards something. Unlearning is exactly what it says. Intending to let go of what has already been learned or acquired. It is not about right or wrong. It is about being open to and exploring something that lies underneath the judgment, underneath the right and the wrong.

  • Holes: The nature of "nothingness", ignorance and the unknown become especially mysterious when recognized as a "hole", as remarkably discussed by Roberto Casati and Achille C. Varzi (Holes and Other Superficialities, 1994) -- with respect to the borderlines of metaphysics, everyday geometry, and the theory of perception (as they summarize in the entry on holes in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). What might indeed be the cognitive implications, as separately discussed (Existential implications -- of a "hole" in conventional reality?, 2012) ?

These four possibilities together suggest a useful insight into the experiential dynamics of the relationship between knowing and ignoring. This derives in part from the adage take a step back, or retreat in order better to advance -- which acquires an experientially provocative sense through the sexual innuendo in the French form reculer pour mieux sauter. That interpretation relates the case of unlearning to sexual intercourse. It might also be interpreted as forgetting in order better to remember (as often recommended in the quest for creative inspiration). Together these offer insights into ignoring in order better to know. The insight is enhanced by the mysterious nature of "hole", both as a fundamental attractor and with respect to a memory "lapse" or "blank", especially as described in French trou de mémoire.

An extensive commentary on the interplay between knowing and not-knowing is offered by James S. Atherton (Doceo; Knowing and not knowing, 2011). He acknowledges "playing around with a conceit", namely the two senses of the term "know" -- awareness of self and knowledge of the world. With the aid of diagrams, he considers the matter in terms of:

  • Not knowing you don't know
  • Knowing you don't know
  • Knowing and not knowing that you know

Many other possibilities, meriting further exploration, are cited in the literature with respect to engaging with the unknown, as discussed previously (Going Nowhere through Not-knowing Where to Go, 2012). Some are briefly indicated, and tentatively clustered, as follows:

Understanding the challenge of the knowing-not-knowing dynamic of any university community could be framed through conversation and its possible transformations within a "multiversal" community, as separately discussed (Enactivating Multiversal Community: hearing a pattern of voices in the global wilderness, 2012; Transforming the Art of Conversation: conversing as the transformative science of development, 2012). As a "conversity", a University of Ignorance might then embody a complementary extreme to a conventional university in this dynamic (Complementarity of university and conversity?, 2012).


[Parts: First | Prev | Next | Last | All | PDF] [Links: To-K | From-K | From-Kx | Refs ]